Inside the Briefcase

Ironclad SaaS Security for Cloud-Forward Enterprises

Ironclad SaaS Security for Cloud-Forward Enterprises

The 2015 Anthem data breach was the result of...

The Key Benefits of Using Social Media for Business

The Key Benefits of Using Social Media for Business

Worldwide, there are more than 2.6 billion social media...

Gartner IT Sourcing, Procurement, Vendor and Asset Management Summit 2018, September 5 – 7, in Orlando, FL

Gartner IT Sourcing, Procurement, Vendor and Asset Management Summit 2018, September 5 – 7, in Orlando, FL

Register with code GARTITB and save $350 off the...

Infographic: The Three Pillars of Digital Identity: Trust, Consent, Knowledge

Infographic: The Three Pillars of Digital Identity: Trust, Consent, Knowledge

8,434 adults were surveyed to gauge consumer awareness of...

FICO Scales with Oracle Cloud

FICO Scales with Oracle Cloud

Doug Clare, Vice President at FICO, describes how Oracle...

Actionable Content: A Framework for Better Decision-Making

August 27, 2012 No Comments

By Jacqueline Mitus, MD, Senior Vice President, Product Strategy; Steve Silverstein, MD, FACEP, Vice President, Chief Clinical Architect; and Matthew Zubiller, Vice President, Decision Management; McKesson Health Solutions

All clinical content is “actionable” to some degree, meaning it can be absorbed, understood and acted upon. However, significant barriers exist that limit the degree to which content can be used to change behavior and drive positive clinical and financial outcomes.

The first challenge is quality. Continuously addressed by professional, governmental and similar organizations, the synthesis of valid and relevant information from the volume of articles, guidelines, papers and other available sources far exceeds an individual’s ability. To determine whether clinical content is of the highest possible quality, the following questions must be asked:

  • Is the content fact-based, rational and founded on evidence-based standards of care?
  • Is the content comprehensive — does it represent the most knowledgeable and appropriate distillation of the vast quantity of material available?
  • Is the content current, given the rapid pace of change?

The second challenge is rendering context-specific content to drive efficient decision making. For example, unique clinical circumstances can be considered to render the content more valuable and relevant:

  • To the patient/member (e.g., age, sex, health profile)
  • To the health plan (e.g., coverage, benefit)
  • To the provider (e.g., specialty, patient mix, value-based contracts)

The third challenge is accessibility. Given healthcare’s myriad workflows, how is content delivered when and where it is needed to best support decision making:

  • For example, at the point of care in the workflow of ordering a test or documenting an encounter and care plan, without requiring access to a separate system?
  • How is the same information shared among staff with varying roles, reducing duplicative or replacing labor-intensive functions while increasing information transparency and collaboration?
  • How is that information made available to both the providers of and the payers for that patient’s care?

Click here to view this whitepaper

Featured White Papers

Leave a Reply

(required)

(required)


ADVERTISEMENT

Gartner