Inside the Briefcase

FICO Scales with Oracle Cloud

FICO Scales with Oracle Cloud

Doug Clare, Vice President at FICO, describes how Oracle...

Is Your Enterprise IT the Best It Can Be?

Is Your Enterprise IT the Best It Can Be?

Enterprise IT is a driver of the global economy....

The IoT Imperative for Consumer Industries

The IoT Imperative for Consumer Industries

This IDC white paper examines current and future...

How to align your visual brand guidelines and create consistently on-brand content

How to align your visual brand guidelines and create consistently on-brand content

In this ebook, we’ll explore the various themes leading...

Your B2B Content Strategy in 2017: How To Think Like A Movie Studio + 6 Other Tactics

Your B2B Content Strategy in 2017: How To Think Like A Movie Studio + 6 Other Tactics

Jon Lombardo, Creative Lead, LinkedIn, reveals in this presentation...

Do We Really Need a New Microsoft?

December 5, 2011 No Comments

The discussion is already nearly five years old, and yet the vacancy in the public conscience persists as if something big had collapsed just last week. Microsoft is no longer the dominating, polarizing force that it was in the previous decade. The mindset of the company that once preached to its employees, “Every line of code that is written to our standards is a small victory; every line of code that is written to any other standard, is a small defeat,” has exited out the back door and sneaked past the gaze of European regulators.

And boy, do we ever miss it. From the moment Ycombinator co-founder Paul Graham famously proclaimed “Microsoft is Dead,” our casting couches have been warmed by the seats of would-be substitutes. Like it or not, Microsoft fulfilled a latent psychological need in many folks’ minds: the need for a strongly polarizing force that made it easier to decide what to like and what to hate.

Humble pie

The very fact that this may be a valid question suggests, as my colleague Joe Brockmeier recently remarked in a discussion on the topic, that Microsoft is no longer Microsoft. The need for “a Microsoft” is about the desire for something to base our arguments for the future of computingagainst. “Openness” was so much easier to define when one could simply point to Microsoft and say, “Not that.”

Read More…

DATA and ANALYTICS , News, Top Stories

Leave a Reply

(required)

(required)


ADVERTISEMENT

IBC 2017

ITBriefcase Comparison Report