Understanding PaaS LimitationsMay 1, 2012 1 Comment
Written by: Gabriel Monroy, co-founder and CTO of OpDemand
By many accounts 2012 is the year Platform-as-a-Service goes mainstream. PaaS offerings from Heroku and Cloud Foundry are awash in positive press. Stories of progressive developers adopting and succeeding with PaaS are increasingly common. Even IaaS poster-child Netflix is now promoting a PaaS strategy.
Is PaaS really ready for prime time?
For low-volume web applications built using common stacks, the answer is a resounding yes. Deploying a standard Ruby-on-Rails application on Heroku couldn’t be easier. The PaaS workflow is ideal for today’s agile development teams. Although adoption is still nascent and there aren’t many high-profile PaaS success stories yet, there will be soon.
But before you get swept up in PaaS fever, it is important to note that there are some fundamental drawbacks of PaaS that all IT decision makers should be aware of.
The most common criticism of PaaS is vendor lock-in – and rightfully so. PaaS users are at the mercy of their provider when it comes to price increases, unwanted technology changes and shifts in provider direction that (in extreme cases) can even require entirely rewriting your application.
In order for PaaS technology to deploy and scale different applications in the same fashion, all applications must conform to a set of rules and best practices – for example Heroku’s twelve-factor app methodology. This means:
- Your applications must conform exactly to PaaS vendor specifications
- It probably won’t be worth porting your legacy applications to a PaaS
- You should only consider PaaS for new apps built with modern stacks
PaaS runtimes are optimized for a specific set of languages and frameworks. Google App Engine only supports Python, Java and Go. Cloud Foundry only supports Java, Node.js and Ruby. Because access to the operating system is restricted, even if your desired programming language and framework are supported, chances are you will find yourself fighting against runtime limitations:
- The version of your desired framework and runtime may not be available
- You may not be able to install the dependencies and libraries you need
- You may be blocked from performing common OS-level system calls
PaaS providers understand that most applications require some type of backing data store, caching layer, message-bus and other middleware services. Some PaaS providers offer a set of add-ons to fill this gap. Because add-ons are built to support the most commonly requested use-cases, they often prove limiting:
- Available add-ons may be insufficient or unsuited to your use-case
- Integrating your own add-on equivalents may be difficult or impossible
- You may have limited control over managing multi-tenant add-ons
PaaS providers strive for a NoOps methodology, where IT infrastructure is abstracted, IT operations skillsets are irrelevant and developers can operate deployments themselves. While this may be feasible for simple applications, PaaS can limit critical operational capabilities:
- You may be prevented from customizing build and deploy automation
- You may be unable to debug live production deployments
- Your security, networking and storage options may be severely limited
- You may have no control over hosting decisions, including an inability to deploy to specific geographic locations
It’s important to note that not all PaaS’s contain all of these limitations. For example, Cloud Foundry’s VM model offers greater control over hosting decisions. Heroku build packs can be customized provided you have the expertise. However, with all Platform-as-a-Service you give up some measure of control in exchange for a streamlined workflow and less operational headache. The trade-off may be worth it; it may not. The answer depends on the PaaS, the application and the organization it is serving.
Gabriel Monroy is the CTO of OpDemand, a next-generation platform for agile cloud infrastructure management. Gabe is an expert in information systems design with a focus on automating secure and scalable systems in the cloud. Gabe has advised public and private companies on a range of issues including cloud computing, software and systems security and IT operational efficiency.Fresh Ink